M31.1 CONNECT THE MECHANISM
Ask what would change if an action changed the world
Treatment A beat treatment B for small kidney stones and for large ones, yet lost overall. Untangle the paradox with one drawing and one weighted average.
LESSON OVERVIEW15 min lesson
Lesson overview
Treatment A beat treatment B for small kidney stones and for large ones, yet lost overall. Untangle the paradox with one drawing and one weighted average.
What you’ll explore
- Tell seeing from doing, draw a causal graph of your assumptions, adjust for confounders with the backdoor formula, and avoid adjusting for mediators and colliders.
GO TO THE SOURCE
Original explanations, connected to the research.
Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (Charig et al., BMJ, 1986)Confounding and Simpson's paradox (Julious & Mullee, BMJ, 1994)Causal inference in statistics: An overview (Pearl, 2009)Causal Inference: What If (Hernán & Robins)Suggest a correction
A precise note can make an explanation better.
Choose the scene and describe what needs attention. Download a feedback file to share through a channel you already use. This page does not send feedback or connect you with a reviewer.